Battlefield 1 942
Author: c | 2025-04-25
942 Battlefield Dr Friday, . OPEN HOUSE May 18th 1 - 4 pm . Posted by 942 Battlefield Dr at 7:51 PM No comments: Friday, Ap. Welcome Home. Posted
942 Battlefield Dr, Nashville, TN
Hi All,I am struggling with iperf between windows and linux. When I install Linux on same hardware, I get ~1G bandwidth, however, when I install windows on it I get ~150 Mbps.I know distance does have a impact when it comes to throughput but why it doesn't have any effect when I install Linux on same hardware?Would like to know why iperf is sensitive about the distance on windows application but not on Linux?Stats:►Test 1:Version iperf 3.1.7Operating System: Linux Red Hat (3.10.0-1160.53.1.el7.x86_64)Latency between Server & client is 12ms$ ping 10.42.160.10 -c 2PING 10.42.160.10 (10.42.160.10) 56(84) bytes of data.64 bytes from 10.42.160.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=12.5 ms64 bytes from 10.42.160.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=11.9 ms--- 10.42.160.10 ping statistics ---2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001msrtt min/avg/max/mdev = 11.924/12.227/12.531/0.323 ms►Upload from Client to Server$ iperf3 -c 10.42.160.10 -p 8443 -b 2G -t 5Connecting to host 10.42.160.10, port 8443[ 4] local 10.43.243.204 port 60094 connected to 10.42.160.10 port 8443[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 97.6 MBytes 819 Mbits/sec 0 2.60 MBytes[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 112 MBytes 942 Mbits/sec 0 2.61 MBytes[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 2.61 MBytes[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 112 MBytes 942 Mbits/sec 0 2.64 MBytes[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 112 MBytes 942 Mbits/sec 0 2.66 MBytes[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr[ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 546 MBytes 917 Mbits/sec 0 sender[ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 546 MBytes 917 Mbits/sec receiveriperf Done.►Download from Server to Client$ iperf3 -c 10.42.160.10 -p 8443 -b 2G -t 5 -RConnecting to host 10.42.160.10, port 8443Reverse mode, remote host 10.42.160.10 is sending[ 4] local 10.43.243.204 port 60098 connected to 10.42.160.10 port 8443[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 108 MBytes 903 Mbits/sec[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 112 MBytes 942 Mbits/sec[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 112. 942 Battlefield Dr Friday, . OPEN HOUSE May 18th 1 - 4 pm . Posted by 942 Battlefield Dr at 7:51 PM No comments: Friday, Ap. Welcome Home. Posted Seller feedback (942) 3c (33) - Feedback left by buyer. Past year. Verified purchase. Suuuper solid seller. Killer price, fast shipping. Battlefield 1 Video Games Battlefield Series. Battlefield 3 [Release] ROP-BF3-Minimap-Cheat: sponsored banners. Save 942 Reputation: 8204 Rep Power: 177. Points: 18,984, Level: 18. Level up: 79%, 316 Points needed. Level up: 0% Close side sheet Page 1 of 942 Testing the 2-inch snubbies in .22 LR and .22 WMR.After several hundred rounds through each, the author decided a 2-inch .22 LR is the ideal trainer, while a 3-inch Model 942 in .22 WMR would make a better trail gun. Beyond the weight, part of that in-hand appeal is the ergonomic rubber grip, which seats well in my large, glove-sized hands. The grips are interchangeable with aftermarket options made for Taurus 85, 856, 605, 380 and 905 revolvers, including the red-laser option from Viridian. The weight and the grip make it a sound-handling iron.Dimensionally, the 942 compares to the 605—a J-frame-comparable subcompact. The cylinder rotates counterclockwise, and the release and hammer have a nice burring. The drift rear sight, held in place with a small flat-head screw, can be adjusted for windage,. The replaceable front serrated ramp sight is pinned. It’s black, but that can be cured with a little nail polish or by swapping in a fiber-optic, if so inclined.The 942 shares some DNA with Taurus’ previous rimfire revolver, the Model 94. The main criticism of the 94 was its overly stiff trigger. Taurus engineers corrected that with the 942 by improving the trigger leverage and tweaking the return spring design. In single-action, the trigger breaks at 4 pounds on my test .22 LR and 4 pounds, 6 ounces on the .22 WMR, as tested with a mechanical Timney gauge. There’s very little creep. In double-action, the trigger stages beautifully.The overall package is accurate, laying down 3-inch groups withComments
Hi All,I am struggling with iperf between windows and linux. When I install Linux on same hardware, I get ~1G bandwidth, however, when I install windows on it I get ~150 Mbps.I know distance does have a impact when it comes to throughput but why it doesn't have any effect when I install Linux on same hardware?Would like to know why iperf is sensitive about the distance on windows application but not on Linux?Stats:►Test 1:Version iperf 3.1.7Operating System: Linux Red Hat (3.10.0-1160.53.1.el7.x86_64)Latency between Server & client is 12ms$ ping 10.42.160.10 -c 2PING 10.42.160.10 (10.42.160.10) 56(84) bytes of data.64 bytes from 10.42.160.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=12.5 ms64 bytes from 10.42.160.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=57 time=11.9 ms--- 10.42.160.10 ping statistics ---2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001msrtt min/avg/max/mdev = 11.924/12.227/12.531/0.323 ms►Upload from Client to Server$ iperf3 -c 10.42.160.10 -p 8443 -b 2G -t 5Connecting to host 10.42.160.10, port 8443[ 4] local 10.43.243.204 port 60094 connected to 10.42.160.10 port 8443[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr Cwnd[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 97.6 MBytes 819 Mbits/sec 0 2.60 MBytes[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 112 MBytes 942 Mbits/sec 0 2.61 MBytes[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec 0 2.61 MBytes[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 112 MBytes 942 Mbits/sec 0 2.64 MBytes[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 112 MBytes 942 Mbits/sec 0 2.66 MBytes[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr[ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 546 MBytes 917 Mbits/sec 0 sender[ 4] 0.00-5.00 sec 546 MBytes 917 Mbits/sec receiveriperf Done.►Download from Server to Client$ iperf3 -c 10.42.160.10 -p 8443 -b 2G -t 5 -RConnecting to host 10.42.160.10, port 8443Reverse mode, remote host 10.42.160.10 is sending[ 4] local 10.43.243.204 port 60098 connected to 10.42.160.10 port 8443[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 108 MBytes 903 Mbits/sec[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 112 MBytes 942 Mbits/sec[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 112 MBytes 941 Mbits/sec[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 112
2025-03-28Testing the 2-inch snubbies in .22 LR and .22 WMR.After several hundred rounds through each, the author decided a 2-inch .22 LR is the ideal trainer, while a 3-inch Model 942 in .22 WMR would make a better trail gun. Beyond the weight, part of that in-hand appeal is the ergonomic rubber grip, which seats well in my large, glove-sized hands. The grips are interchangeable with aftermarket options made for Taurus 85, 856, 605, 380 and 905 revolvers, including the red-laser option from Viridian. The weight and the grip make it a sound-handling iron.Dimensionally, the 942 compares to the 605—a J-frame-comparable subcompact. The cylinder rotates counterclockwise, and the release and hammer have a nice burring. The drift rear sight, held in place with a small flat-head screw, can be adjusted for windage,. The replaceable front serrated ramp sight is pinned. It’s black, but that can be cured with a little nail polish or by swapping in a fiber-optic, if so inclined.The 942 shares some DNA with Taurus’ previous rimfire revolver, the Model 94. The main criticism of the 94 was its overly stiff trigger. Taurus engineers corrected that with the 942 by improving the trigger leverage and tweaking the return spring design. In single-action, the trigger breaks at 4 pounds on my test .22 LR and 4 pounds, 6 ounces on the .22 WMR, as tested with a mechanical Timney gauge. There’s very little creep. In double-action, the trigger stages beautifully.The overall package is accurate, laying down 3-inch groups with
2025-04-13INFILTRATOR ELITE - BATTLEFIELD 1 6:46 TheTacticalBrit Guide Maps Tips & Tricks Battlefield 1 - Apocalypse Official Trailer 1:10 Battlefield Battlefield 1 Official Reveal Trailer 1:20 Battlefield Battlefield 1 Air Assault Mode Tutorial 1:11 Battlefield Battlefield 1 Turning Tides Official Trailer 0:47 Battlefield Battlefield 1 Gameplay Series: Tutorial - Conquest Assault 1:48 Battlefield Battlefield 1 Turning Tides Official Trailer 0:49 Battlefield Battlefield 1 In the Name of the Tsar Official Launch Trailer 0:38 Battlefield Battlefield 1 Incursions Official Introduction Trailer 2:42 Battlefield Battlefield Monthly Recap - Order of Battle - July 2017 3:32 Battlefield Battlefield 1 Incursions Official Introduction Trailer 2:42 Battlefield Battlefield 1 Official Gameplay Trailer 2:01 Battlefield How to Play the Medic in Battlefield 1 1:10 Neebs Gaming Beginning Player Classes Guide How to Play The New Air Assault Mode in Battlefield 1 Apocalypse 6:25 Lossy Guide Maps Tips & Tricks Battlefield 1: Passchendaele Map Guide + Tips & Tricks for Clips 4:08 Ascend - Battlefield Guide Maps Tips & Tricks INFILTRATOR ELITE - BATTLEFIELD 1 6:46 TheTacticalBrit Guide Maps Tips & Tricks Battlefield 1 Turning Tides: Achi Baba - Tips & Tricks 3:29 Ascend - Battlefield Guide Maps Tips & Tricks ➤ CAPORETTO MAP OVERVIEW! - Battlefield 1 Apocalypse DLC 4:10 Westie Guide Maps Tips & Tricks Battlefield 1 New Map Tips: River Somme (Apocalypse DLC Guide) 3:23 Flakfire Guide Maps Tips & Tricks Battlefield 1 New Map Tips: Heligoland Bight (Turning Tides DLC Guide) 3:43 Flakfire Guide Maps Tips & Tricks Battlefield 1 Turning Tides: Capes
2025-04-141, 'amount': 100, 'status': 'IN_PROGRESS'}openpay.customers.charges.list( customerId, searchParams, function (error, body, response) { // ... });Instead of the 'creation' field in the 'searchParams' object, you can use:"creation[gte]" : "2021-10-22" to find charges created after the given date"creation[lte]" : "2021-10-22" to find charges created before the given dateInstead of the 'amount' field in the 'searchParams' object, you can use:"amount[gte]" : 100 to find charges with amount bigger than the amount given"amount[lte]" : 100 to find charges with amount smaller than the amount givenAllowed statuses:IN_PROGRESSCOMPLETEDREFUNDEDCHARGEBACK_PENDINGCHARGEBACK_ACCEPTEDCHARGEBACK_ADJUSTMENTCHARGE_PENDINGCANCELLEDFAILEDCustomers####Create a customervar newCustomer = { 'external_id' : '', "name": "Pedro Diego", "last_name": "Alatorre Martínez", "email": "[email protected]", "phone_number" : "5744484951", "customer_address": { "department":"Medellín", "city":"Antioquía", "additional":"Avenida 7f bis # 138-58 Apartamento 942" }};openpay.customers.create( newCustomer, function (error, body, response) { // ... });Update a customervar customerId = 'Customer ID';var newData = { "name": "Pedro Diego", "last_name": "Alatorre Martínez", "email": "[email protected]", "phone_number": "5744484951", "customer_address": { "department": "Medellín", "city": "Antioquía", "additional": "Avenida 7f bis # 138-58 Apartamento 942" }};openpay.customers.update( customerId, newData, function (error, body, response) { // ... });Get a customervar customerId = 'Customer ID';openpay.customers.get( customerId, function (error, body, response) { // ... });Delete a customervar customerId = 'Customer ID';openpay.customers.delete( customerId, function (error, body, response) { // ... });List clientsconst searchParams = { 'external_id': 'External ID', 'creation': 'yyyy-mm-dd', 'offset': 1, 'limit': 1}openpay.customers.list( searchParams, function (error, body, response) { // ... });Instead of the 'creation' field in the 'searchParams' object, you can use:"creation[gte]" : "2021-10-22" to find customers created after the given date"creation[lte]" : "2021-10-22" to find customers created before the given datePlansCreate a planvar newPlan = { "amount": 150, "status_after_retry": "CANCELLED", "retry_times": 2, "name": "Curso de ingles", "repeat_unit": "month", "trial_days": "30", "repeat_every": "1"};openpay.plans.create( newPlan, function (error, body, response) { // ... });Allowed values for 'status_after_retry':UNPAIDCANCELLEDUpdate a planvar planId = 'Plan ID';var newData = { "name": "New name", "trial_days": 1}openpay.plans.update( planId, newData, function (error, body, response) { // ... });Get a planvar planId = 'Plan ID';openpay.plans.get( planId, function (error, body, response) { // ... });Delete a planvar planId = 'Plan ID';openpay.plans.delete( planId, function (error, body, response) { // ... });List plansvar searchParams = { 'creation': 'yyyy-mm-dd', 'limit': 10, 'offset': 1};openpay.plans.list(searchParams, function (error, body, response)
2025-04-24